|
Shorelines
March 2008 - Posts
By David Tatarowicz
Thursday, Mar 27 2008, 05:57 PM
I had noted in an earlier posting that a major TIF property had a questionable assessment.
The property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus had a drastic change in assessment for 2007.
The assessment dropped $598,059 or about 21% of its former assessed value. In addition, the assessor changed the property from a parcel with improvements to vacant land --- even though there is still an apartment building on the property.
When I questioned the Assessors Office as to why the new assessment discounted the aparment building, I was told that the Assessor knew there was an offer on the property, and that the new owners planned to tear down the building and get TIF funding for a new project --- and that the Assessor valued the property as though is was empty land, based upon what might happen.
In fact, the property had an occupied apartment building and there was not even a closed sale on the property.
In checking with the WI Dept of Rev, they affirmed that the assessment was done incorrectly, and that the property should have been properly assessed with the improvements, and not as vacant land. Future planned use has no affect on the present use and market value.
The almost $600,000 that the assessor dropped off the value of the property means that all property owners in Shorewood pay more in taxes to make up the difference.
Also when the TIF district does their calculations on the increase of value on the property, they will have an extra cushion of $600,000 that will go to the TIF and not to the schools, county, MATC, etc ...... which again will be taxes shifted from that property to other property owners in Shorewood.
Following are the assessments for the Sherburn property for the past few years, applying the applicable State Equalizers:
Sherburn Land Improvements Total
2004 474,000 1,627,240 2,101,240
2005 507,900 2,250,282 2,758,182
2006 530,425 2,350,081 2,880,506
2007 2,282,447 00000000 2,282,447
This is a drop in the assessment of $598,059 which equals a 21% drop in value !!
HERE IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL TAX REPORT THAT STEVE REQUESTED I POST
|
|
|
|
Full Report Property Location : 3907-3909 N Sherburn PL |
|
|
|
Taxed by: Village Of Shorewood |
|
Owner : |
Taxkey # 2758992002 |
|
|
Toohey John L & Barbara 16620 Woods Edge CT Brookfield, WI 53005-3548 |
Owner Occupied: Property Address : 3907-3909 N Sherburn PL Shorewood, WI 53211-1870 |
County: Milwaukee Taxed by: Village Of Shorewood Taxkey # 2758992002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assessments |
|
|
Assessment Year |
Property Class |
Land Assessment |
Improvement Assessment |
Total Assessment |
Percent Of Change |
Acres |
Ratio |
|
|
|
2007 |
Commercial |
$ 2,275,600 |
|
$ 2,275,600 |
42.671 |
|
0.997760393 |
|
|
|
2006 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.678759286 |
|
|
|
2005 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.708868690 |
|
|
|
2004 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.759208547 |
|
|
|
2003 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.813959753 |
|
|
|
2002 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.849216789 |
|
|
|
2001 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.935897456 |
|
|
|
2000 |
Commercial |
$ 360,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 1,595,000 |
39.423 |
|
1.032343920 |
|
|
|
1999 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
0.000 |
|
0.820232669 |
|
|
|
1998 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
Commercial |
$ 295,500 |
$ 848,500 |
$ 1,144,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Year |
Tax Before Lottery Credit |
Lottery Credit |
Tax After Lottery Credit |
Special Taxes |
Special Assessment |
Special Charges |
Full Pay Amount |
Ratio |
|
2007 |
$53,389.56 |
|
$53,389.56 |
|
|
|
$53,389.56 |
0.997760393 |
|
2006 |
$53,853.11 |
|
$53,853.11 |
|
|
|
$53,853.11 |
0.678759286 |
|
2005 |
$52,997.66 |
|
$52,997.66 |
|
|
|
$52,997.66 |
0.708868690 |
|
2004 |
$53,832.28 |
|
$53,832.28 |
|
|
|
$53,832.28 |
0.759208547 |
|
2003 |
$53,059.26 |
|
$53,059.26 |
|
|
|
$53,059.26 |
0.813959753 |
|
2002 |
$51,306.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.849216789 |
|
2001 |
$47,507.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.935897456 |
|
2000 |
$44,840.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.032343920 |
|
1999 |
$41,988.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.820232669 |
|
1998 |
$41,760.54 |
$70.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
$42,445.56 |
$111.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
$42,242.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Square Feet : |
|
Year Built : |
|
Township : |
7N |
|
Bedrooms : |
|
Year Remodeled : |
|
Range : |
22E |
|
Full Baths : |
|
Effective Year Built : |
|
Section : |
9 |
|
Half Baths : |
|
Air Conditioning : |
|
Quarter : |
|
|
Total Rooms : |
|
Fireplace : |
|
Pool : |
|
|
Number of Stories : |
|
Number of Units : |
|
Attic : |
|
|
Building Type : |
|
Basement : |
|
|
Exterior Wall : |
|
Heat : |
|
|
Exterior Condition : |
|
Garage : |
|
|
Land Use : |
|
School District : |
5355 Shorewood School District |
|
Zoning : |
|
Historic Designation : |
|
|
|
|
Legal Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lands In Ne 1/4 Sec 9-7-22 Com 92.12' Sely Of Intersec Of S Li Of E Capitol DR &... |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT DO YOU THINK? YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !
|
By David Tatarowicz
Wednesday, Mar 26 2008, 02:23 PM
The current Shorewood Village Board is spending some big dollars and planning to spend more, and gambling that increasing property values will pay the bill.
Shorewood is using what is called a TIF (tax incremental financing) as a Financing Tool to pay for various projects, such as Streetscaping, the River Project, Condo Development, etc.
According to the information published by the Wisconsin Dept of Revenue, a TIF works like this:
"Tax Incremental Finance, or TIF, is a financing tool that allows municipalities to invest in infrastructure and other improvements, and pay for these investments by capturing
property tax revenue from the newly developed property. An area is identified (the tax
incremental district, or TID) as appropriate for a certain type of development, and
projects are identified to encourage and facilitate the desired development. Then as
property values rise, the property tax paid on that private development is used by the
municipality to pay for the projects."
There is a risk though, that IF property values Decline, rather than Increase --- All the Property Tax Payers will pay for the expenditures through Increased Property Taxes, as explained here by the Dept of Rev:
" Municipalities can invest significant amounts of money into these infrastructure
improvements in hopes that growth will follow (sometimes called the "build it, and
they will come" strategy). However, if little or no private development occurs after the
improvements are made, there may be no tax increment revenue with which to pay for
the investment. If there is no increment revenue, the bonds used to pay for the
improvements will have to be paid for with general tax revenue. Paying for these bonds without a larger tax base means a higher tax burden. Another risk of over-investing can be that the site is improved, but the improvements actually prevent some types of development from being able to use the site."
The Big Question now becomes --- are Shorewood Property Values Increasing or Decreasing ?
There are many different ways to calculate the values, and with the current volatile real estate market --- it is anybody's guess of what the values will be by the end of the current year. The basic method of calculating property values, involves what is termed "Market Value", and changes in what the sales prices are in comparison between two comparable time periods. (Other methods of valuation, "replacement" and "income" are not commonly used for residential property appraisals or assessments).
Taking a snapshot of Single Family Home sales in Shorewood for the time period of January 1st of this year (2008) to date, compared with the same time period for last year (2007), there is a notable trend:
JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 26, 2007 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (17 sales)
ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE DAYS ON MARKET SALES PRICE
189,900 24 192,100
214,900 169 180,000
224,900 114 215,000
230,000 16 221,500
259,900 126 235,000
289,900 183 237,000
289,000 13 289,000
298,000 46 298,100
329,900 99 295,000
309,000 20 310,000
320,000 45 320,000
339,000 42 335,000
364,900 43 356,000
387,900 68 350,000
449,000 10 460,000
749,000 18 750,000
1,495,000 62 1,425,000
Tot 6,740,200 1098 6,468,700
Avg 396,482 65 380,511
THERE WAS APPROX A 4% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE
JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 26, 2008 --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SOLD IN SHOREWOOD (9 sales)
ORIGINAL ASKING PRICE DAYS ON MARKET SALES PRICE
279,000 112 237,000
314,900 146 290,000
399,900 141 300,000
415,000 181 376,500
424,900 172 417,000
479,900 91 449,000
589,900 88 555,000
599,900 31 560,000
1,349,000 204 1,000,000
Tot 4,852,400 1166 4,184,500
Avg 539,155 130 464,944
THERE WAS APPROX A 13% DECREASE BETWEEN ORIG PRICE AND SALES PRICE, AND DAYS ON MARKET DOUBLED OVER THE PREVIOUS YEAR.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ? YOUR COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED !
|
By David Tatarowicz
Wednesday, Mar 12 2008, 10:51 AM
MYSPACE: A Must Read for All
EVERYONE NEEDS TO READ ALL OF THIS and HAVE CHILDREN READ I TOO!
After tossing her books on the sofa, she decided to grab a snack and get on-line. She logged on under her screen name ByAngel213. She checked her Buddy List and saw GoTo123 was on. She sent him an instant message:
ByAngel213: Hi. I'm glad you are on! I thought someone was following me home today. It was really weird!
GoTo123: LOL You watch too much TV. Why would someone be following you? Don't you live in a safe neighborhood?
ByAngel213: Of course I do. LOL I guess it was my imagination cuz' I didn't see anybody when I looked out.
GoTo123: Unless you gave your name out on-line. You haven't done that have you?
ByAngel213: Of course not. I'm not stupid you know.
GoTo123: Did you have a softball game after school today?
ByAngel213: Yes and we won!!
GoTo123: That's great! Who did you play?
ByAngel213: We played the Hornets. LOL. Their uniforms are so gross! They look like bees. LOL
GoTo123: What is your team called?
ByAngel213: We are the Canton Cats. We have tiger paws on our uniforms. They are really cool.
GoTo1 23: Did you pitch?
ByAngel213: No I play second base. I got to go. My homework has to be done before my parents get home. I don't want them mad at me. Bye!
GoTo123: Catch you later. Bye
Meanwhile.......GoTo123 went to the member menu and began to search for her profile. When it came up, he highlighted it and printed it out. He took out a pen and began to write down what he knew about Angel so far.
Her name: Shannon Birthday: Jan. 3, 1985 Age: 13 State where she lived: North Carolina
Hobbies: softball, chorus, skating and going to the mall. Besides this information, he knew she lived in Canton because she had just told him. He knew she stayed by herself until 6:30 p.m. every afternoon until her parents came home from work. He knew she played softball on Thursday afternoons on the school team, and the team was named the Canton Cats. Her favorite number 7 was printed on her jersey. He knew she was in the eighth grade at the Canton Junior High School . She had told him all this in the conversations they had on- line. He had enough information to find her now.
Shannon didn't tell her parents about the incident on the way home from the ballpark that day. She didn't want them to make a scene and stop her from walking home from the softball games. Parents were always overreacting and hers were the worst. It made her wish she was not an only child. Maybe if she had brothers and sisters, her parents wouldn't be so overprotective.
By Thursday, Shannon had forgotten about the footsteps following her.
Her game was in full swing when suddenly she felt someone staring at her. It was then that the memory came back. She glanced up from her second base position to see a man watching her closely.
He was leaning against the fence behind first base and he smiled when she looked at him. He didn't look scary and she quickly dismissed the sudden fear she had felt.
After the game, he sat on a bleacher while she talked to the coach. She noticed his smile once again as she walked past him. He nodded and she smiled back. He noticed her name on the back of her shirt. He knew he had found her.
Quietly, he walked a safe distance behind her. It was only a few blocks to Shannon 's home, and once he saw where she lived he quickly returned to the park to get his car.
Now he had to wait. He decided to get a bite to eat until the time came to go to Shannon 's house. He drove to a fast food restaurant and sat there until time to make his move.
Shannon was in her room later that evening when she heard voices in the living room.
'Shannon, come here,' her father called. He sounded upset and she couldn't imagine why. She went into the room to see the man from the ballpark sitting on the sofa.
'Sit down,' her father began, 'this man has just told us a most interesting story about you.'
Shannon sat back. How could he tell her parents anything? She had never seen him before today!
'Do you know who I am, Shannon ?' the man asked.
'No,' Shannon answered.
'I am a police officer and your online friend, GoTo123.'
Shannon was stunned. 'That's impossible! GoTo is a kid my age! He's 14. And he lives in Michigan !'
The man smiled. 'I know I told you all that, but it wasn't true. You see, Shannon , there are people on-line who pretend to be kids; I was one of them. But while others do it to injure kids and hurt them, I belong to a group of parents who do it to protect kids from predators. I came here to find you to teach you how dangerous it is to talk to people on-line. You told me enough about yourself to make it easy for me to find you. You named the school you went to, the name of your ball team and the position you played. The number and name on your jersey just made finding you a breeze.'
Shannon was stunned. 'You mean you don't live in Michigan ?'
He laughed. 'No, I live in Raleigh It made you feel safe to think I was so far away, didn't it?'
She nodded.
'I had a friend whose daughter was like you. Only she wasn't as lucky. The guy found her and murdered her while she was home alone. Kids are taught not to tell anyone when they are alone, yet they do it all the time on-line. The wrong people trick you into giving out information a little here and there on-line.. Before you know it, you have told them enough for them to find you without even realizing you have done it. I hope you've learned a lesson from this and won't do it again. Tell others about this so they will be safe too?'
'It's a promise!'
That night Shannon and her Dad and Mom all knelt down together and thanked God for protecting Shannon from what could have been a tragic situation.
*****NOW****
EVEN FORWARD THIS TO PEOPLE WITHOUT KIDS SO THEY CAN SEND IT TO FRIENDS THAT DO HAVE CHILDREN OR GRANDCHILDREN
|
By David Tatarowicz
Tuesday, Mar 4 2008, 01:53 PM
According to property tax information available on the internet, the property at 3907-09 N Sherburn, which is one of the parcels for the Sunrise Development that the Village Board is planning on funding for $800,000 plus has changed dramatically for 2007.
The past assessments for the Sherburn property had a separate assessment for the land and a separate assessment for the improvements (buildings) which is the normal breakdown, and is the way that the property at 1111 E Capitol (Riverbrook Restaurant) is assessed.
Following are the assessments for the Sherburn property for the past few years, applying the applicable State Equalizers:
Sherburn Land Improvements Total
2004 474,000 1,627,240 2,101,240
2005 507,900 2,250,282 2,758,182
2006 530,425 2,350,081 2,880,506
2007 2,282,447 00000000 2,282,447
This is a drop in the assessment of $598,059 which equals a 21% drop in value !!
(note: the 1111 E Capitol Dr property had a decrease in its assessment of about 4%)
-
Is this the only property in Shorewood that has dropped in value by 21% ?
-
Why is the assessment no longer broken down into its parts ?
-
What implications does this have for the proposed Sunrise Development ?
-
Inquiring Minds Want to Know !!
Do you Know ? Do you have any Comments ?
|
More Posts
The opinions and views expressed by Community Voice writers do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Journal Interactive, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel or Community Newspapers. MyCommunityNow.com does not control, is not responsible for, and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of, the postings on this Web log. Readers can report objectionable content by clicking here.
|
|