ShorewoodNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Shorelines


December 2007 - Posts

Capitol Drive Merchants in Shorewood Get 2nd Class Treatment

By David Tatarowicz
Thursday, Dec 20 2007, 03:05 PM

Two nights ago, on the 18th, the Shorewood DPW committed a large crew during the night to do a snow removal operation in the Business District.

Hooray !!!!!

On my block (4400 N Oakland)  and south, they did a great job.  Shoppers can actually get from their cars to the shops now.  

However -- (you knew there was going to be a however) -- the Merchants on Capitol Drive have nothing to cheer about.  As of this afternoon, their stores and the street are still separated by mounds of ice and snow.  

I wonder if anyone on the Shorewood Board of Trustees has ever had any retail experience (other than shopping).  If they ever depended upon retail sales for their livelihood, they would know that this week -- the week before Christmas -- can be a make or break event for many of the merchants.

With the high rate of property taxes that are paid for commercial property in Shorewood --- in addition to the BID tax that commercial property owners pay --- it is outrageous that these merchants are not taken better care of by the Village.

Note to Village Trustees:  Forget about bicycle races, and forget about artist displays by outside vendors at the high school, and forget about spending Tens of Thousands of Dollars Advertising how Friendly Shorewood is to Pedestrians and how Upscale the stores are for Shoppers --- try spending the money on clearing the snow banks so the merchants can make a little money and keep their businesses open.


 

VILLAGE OFFICIALS CLAIM 320% RETURN ON FACADE GRANT INVESTMENT

By David Tatarowicz
Tuesday, Dec 18 2007, 04:53 PM

 I would love a 320% ROI !!!

I am sure that any investor would love to get that kind of Return On Investment --- but I doubt that even Warren Buffet would count those kinds of chickens before they are hatched.

The Community Development Authority is sponsoring a Facade Grant of $800,000 for the apartment building at 3575 N. Oakland.  According to a story in www.shorewoodnow.com by Marie Rohde:


The building  is currently assessed at $3.5 million.

The CDA says the facade improvements will increase the value of the building by $2.256 million and boost neighboring properties by $305,000. 

Doing the math, $800,000 invested with a return of increased value of $2,561,000 is a ROI of 320%.

As a real estate broker, I have been involved in many transactions involving renovation, with single family and multi family properties.  I have never heard of anyone getting that kind of ROI with just a new facade ....

I would certainly like to see a Certified Appraisal of both the value of the building as is, and the value of the building after the facade improvements.  Due to the uniqueness and complexity of this project, such an appraisal would be mostly in narrative, and it would be interesting to see the rationale the appraiser used, and the comps that justify the conclusion.

As a very imperfect comparison (once again considering the uniqueness and complexity of the project) I have printed below the kind of return on investment a homeowner would expect for various renovations.

This is somewhat "apples to oranges" -- but note that on average, no project even pays back the cost !!  The returns are all less than 100%. 

You can find a number of similar charts and comparisons on the internet --- potential Seller are always interested in ways they can sell their property for a higher price. 

Just for fun --- let's pretend that a 320% ROI is doable on this project --- and can be substantiated to the satisfaction of investors/bankers/etc ------- then  why does the Village have to finance the project ?  If it is for real --- drop a dime, call Warren Buffet --- those are the kinds of numbers that would probably get his attention.

What's YOUR TAKE --- please leave your comments below.

Description Of Remodeling Work

Job Cost Resale Value Cost Recouped
Minor Kitchen Remodel

Replace cabinet dooors, oven and cooktop, laminate countertops, sink, faucet and floor, repaint

$8,507 $8,030 94%
Bathroom addition

Add a second bath to a house with 1 or 1.5 baths;include ceramic tile and linen closet

11,645 10,593 91
Major Kitchen Remodel

Redesign kitchen, replacing all of the above, plus built in microwave, custom lighting, island.

21,262 19,190 90
Master Suite

In a house with 2-3 bedrooms, add a 24-foot by 16-foot master suite with walk-in closet, whirlpool tub, separate shower.

36,472 30,530 84
Attic Bedroom

In a 2-3 bedroom house, convert unfinished attic space with bedroom and shower/bath.

22,840 19,084 84
Two-Story Addition

First-floor family room and second floor bedroom with full bath.

55,687 46,236 83
Family Room Addition

Add a 16- by 25-foot room with skylights, hardwood tongue-and-groove floor, fireplace.

31,846 26,483 83
Bathroom Remodel

Update existing bath with new tub, toilet, vanity, medicine cabinet, lighting, tile.

8,423 6,480 77
Replace Windows

10 new 3'x5' aluminum-clad windows with trim.

6,112 4,536 74
Replace Siding

1,250 square feet of new vinyl or aluminum siding and trim.

5,458 3,983 73
Deck Addition

16'x20' deck of pressure-treated pine including built-in-bench, railings and planter.

6,172 4,459 72
Home Office

Convert existing room into office with custom cabinetry and re-wiring for electronic equipment

8,103 5,423 67
Source: Remodeling magazine, 1996-1997 Cost vs. Value Report.

 

IS BIG BLOCK UGLY DEVELOPMENT THE FUTURE FOR SHOREWOOD'S RIVERFRONT ?

By David Tatarowicz
Monday, Dec 17 2007, 01:13 PM
DEAR READERS
 
I RECEIVED A COPY OF THIS LETTER ADDRESSED TO ALL OF SHOREWOOD AND FIND THE CONTENT INTERESTING .......... AFTER YOU READ IT, PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS.  
 
THANKS DAVE 
 
Dear Shorewood friends,
 
Some of you may have heard about a proposal to tear down the Riverbrook Restaurant and the Sherburn place apartments (where I live) to put in a senior living center.
 
As a resident of the apartments and a professional in the field of research and environmental education,  I find SO MANY problems with the development from just about every angle.
 
 1) The developers are not considering any green design.  They are tearing down perfectly good buildings and bringing in all new materials.
 
2) The developer  when asked about green building showed no interest and gave misinformation to the zoning committee. Specifically, she said LEED Certification, (the recognized standard for measuring building sustainability) meant nothing more than slapping a green roof on the building. 
 
3) Green design is not only environmentally friendly, but it is functional and considers the use of the building and the residents that live there. 
 
 4 ) The developer is advertising river views from the upper floors but assured me through some magic of landscaping that you won't see the building from the river
 
 5 ) It's a HUGE 4-story, cookie-cutter box  building from a national chain of senior living centers in which the owners are facing lawsuits for fraud and neglect  (Sunrise Senior Living) .   This is so against what I feel are the strengths of Shorewood - walkable neighborhoods with locally owned businesses.  If senior living is truly needed, it would be easier to swallow this change if this were the future of sustainable design in senior living, designed by Kubala-Washatko, something Shorewood could be proud of.  This is a valuable piece of real estate, and the change they create will be around for a long time.  (And I think the building is hideous)
 
6) We will lose one of the only pockets of diversity in Shorewood where there is relatively affordable living (Sherburn Apartments) and sit-down dining (Riverbrook).  I ate brunch at the Riverbrook on Saturday and was floored by how packed the place was and by the degree of diversity I observed.
 
7) There are currently 50 people at Sherburn apartments, including families, some elderly, and people that have lived there almost thirty years.  At any time these people could get 30 days notice to leave according to the owner who has had terrible communication (virtually none) with the residents or even the building manager. 
 
The truth is, for me this will be an inconvenience - I've moved around a lot.  For others this will be a life upheaval.
 
The project is still in its preliminary stages, but if nothing is done, it will undoubtedly move forward.  I urge anyone that is available to come to the two meetings this week at the Shorewood Village Hall, located on Murray Avenue, 1/2 block south of Capitol, between the Police/Fire Department building and the Shorewood Public Library.  The meetings will be in the courtroom on the second floor unless there is a large turnout, in which case the meeting will be moved to the basement of the library.  (A large turnout would be nice)
 
Meeting times are:
Monday, December 17th, at 7:30pm
Tuesday, December 18th, at 7:00pm
 
Monday's meeting (tonight) will be a presentation of the proposed development by the developer to the Shorewood Village Board.
Tuesday's meeting will be the Zoning and Planning Committee.  They will be discussing this and other projects under consideration by the Village.
 
Please forward this to friends or anyone else who you feel may have an interest in this project.  These are elected officials making this decision and it's up to us to make sure they represent their constituents over an outside developer.
 
Thank you for your support!
 
Tim Vargo
 

 

Suggestions for Trustees Michael Maher's and Dawn Anderson’s Re-election Campaigns

By David Tatarowicz
Wednesday, Dec 12 2007, 01:22 PM
 

Incumbent Village Board Trustees Michael Maher and Dawn Anderson are reportedly going to run for re-election.  At this point, it is uncertain if they will have any opposition to their re-election bid.  If they don’t, they will obviously not need to campaign.  But if they do have opposition, I have some suggestions for campaign literature.

 

Of course they can take credit for spending millions of dollars on new projects such as the Streetscaping and the Marketing of Shorewood.  And let’s not forget their largesse of Village money for the new Professional Sport Quality sports field at SHS (D2D)  --- possibly including a Second Dome by which to landmark that august institution.

 

In regards to the Streetscaping, they may not want to highlight that north Oakland was streetscaped barely 10 years ago --- and already determined to be obsolete.  And they would definitely not want to mention that the new aluminum light poles replacing the 10 year old cast iron poles have begun to fall apart before they have even been plugged in !!!

 

If the new athletic field does get a dome --- perhaps they can find room in it for some space for the Senior population --- who have been waiting for years for an enhancement to their diminished space in the library basement.

 

Most proudly, they can point to the tens of thousands of dollars (from general taxes) and hundreds of thousands from the BID taxes, to market Shorewood --- with a main emphasis on the “Walkability” and “Shopping Friendly” features the Village has to offer.

 

I am pretty sure they will NOT want to mention that they have put no money in the budget to actually clear snow and ice from our sidewalks, crosswalks and commercial parkways --- to actually make them Walkable ! 

 

Most probably, they will not want to feature in their campaign brochures, pictures of the mountains of snow and ice that act as fortress walls between where the shoppers park on the street and the shops they are trying to get to --- and pictures of the crosswalks that at best are covered with slush, ice and snow, making them close to impossible to negotiate – or at worst, the crosswalks that end abruptly at a wall of snow that would require a chair lift to get over.

 

Here are some of the pictures I would advise Anderson and Maher not to use in their re-election bids.

 

 

Wall of Snow & Ice on Parkway Oakland Ave

 

 

Smart Pedestrian Carries his Own Skis

 

 Cross Walk to Show Wall Atwater School

 

Inaccessible Bus Stop Capitol Drive

Shopper Friendly Snow Banks

 

Lake Bluff & Oakland where school kids

cross -- how would someone with a walker

or wheel chair cross this ?

 WHAT DO YOU THINK ?  PLEASE LET US KNOW AND LEAVE A COMMENT.

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Snowbanks and Iced Crosswalks Keep Shorewood Shoppers and Walkers at Home

By David Tatarowicz
Sunday, Dec 9 2007, 05:48 PM

A new motto that you may have noticed on the new official Shorewood website is:

Shorewood --- Just Two Feet From Everything.

 If you think this motto is good --- just wait until the Village Board spends that $45,000 or so dollars they put in the budget to advertise the virtues of Shorewood as a "Walkable" community.

 Driving around the Village today --- I saw it was true --- Everything was just two feet away --- that is everything is just on the other side of a Two Foot High Snowbank !

If you want to park and shop at almost any store on Oakland or Capitol, I hope you get a parking spot near the corner.  Because where ever you are going is on the other side of a Two Foot Snowbank, and you have to walk to the corner to get to the sidewalk.

 Once at the corner, I hope that you are very nimble indeed, as almost all of them have ice fields and trampled down snow, that you still have to navigate.

If you are handicapped and use a walker or cane, you might still have a chance.  If you have to use a wheelchair, you better get it fixed with snow chains.

But hey  --- this time next year, if we have the same wintery conditions, you might be able to drive over to the Shorewood High School and walk around on the astro turf under a nice warm dome.  After all, the Village Board gave almost $500,000 for the D2D !

Of course that money may very well have been better spent if the Board had budgeted to have the snow banks removed from the parkway on the business streets --- and the ice fields cleard at the crosswalks. 

 Or maybe they can take the $45,000 some dollars they are going to spend to advertise Shorewood as a Walkable Community --- and use it to clear snow and really make it so.

 What is YOUR Take ?


 
More Posts

 
The opinions and views expressed by Community Voice writers do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Journal Interactive, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel or Community Newspapers. MyCommunityNow.com does not control, is not responsible for, and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of, the postings on this Web log. Readers can report objectionable content by clicking here.

Posts

Tags

Search the Blogs