ShorewoodNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Curmudgeon's Corner

cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner

Full-Time Fire Department - 2.0

By Al Campbell
Sunday, Dec 23 2007, 09:51 AM

There have been many page views of the Blog concerning a full-time fire department for Germantown in conjunction with the poll now running in GermantownNOW on that question.  If you've not yet made your feelings known, please take time to scroll down after reading this and vote.

It seems that Blog may not have been clear enough in expressing my views that a full-time department would continue to need volunteer paid-on-call members.  These are not mutually exclusive concepts. The full-time crews would simply put a fully manned Engine Company (4 personnel) and Ambulance crew  (2 personnel) on the scene within the six minute average on a 24/7/365 basis, giving the volunteers time to get to the scene to augment the full-time crew.

Quite a few readers have gone the next step with their own comments, and those are always welcome.  Some comments have been quite emotional as you might expect, while others have been quite negative, also as you'd expect.  Among them are several that present, what to me seems, logical and pertinent information from the perspective of those who protect us at the risk of their own lives.  Some have given us the rationale behind the number of personnel required for various size dwellings involved in fire.  Please take time to read all the comments if you've interest.

One suggested that an Open Records request might serve to satisfy my curiosity as well as that of others.  That certainly is a possibility, although one I had hoped we wouldn't need to employ.  Maybe it is time that this approach be employed to try to gather the 'real facts' (as apparently contrasted to the imaginary facts) and get to the bottom of this situation.  Maybe it is time to request some help in that regard from the Citizens for Responsible Government (CRG) which is the group, as you may recall, that ferreted out the information on the MATC that we've quoted and referenced many times.

It seems to me that citizens should be able to gather information from elected officials without the need to go through the formalities of an Open Records request, but it also seems as though some expectations are unlikely to be realized without formalities.  In the end, there seems too much conflicting information not to go forward with such a request.

Comments

Hunter   

I believe that we can all talk about this until we are blue in the face (or fingers since we are typing and not talking).  The issues that are pertinent seem to me to be:

1. Does the Village need to look in to upping staffing for the fire department for the safety of the community?  People are staffed during the day, should they be at night, also?

2. If that is affirmative, how to pay for it?

3. How would the best way to staff at the best cost be?  I would imagine that you would want your people to stay around, so comparables to other communities should be researched.

4. Is there a conflict of interest in the Village Board and Public Safety committee (recently resigned from the Fire Department Jim Langer, Village Board member and head of the Public Safety committee)?  Is there a sense of “You vote for this an I vote for that for you” going on in the Village Board?  I couldn’t say, but the question should be raised.

5. Were members of the Village Board or Village Manager derelict in their duties in the way that the IAEP union was allowed to organize?  Accepting a card vote just doesn’t happen in public government anyway you look at it.  How did the Village make sure that all potential members of the new union were made aware?  I personally know at least one member who was not allowed to voice his opinion because he was not “invited” to the “vote”.

6. Were members of the Village Board or Village Manager derelict in their duties in how the IAEP contract was negotiated?  Why was the Fire Chief not allowed to be included in these sessions and why was his input not solicited?  I have heard that he tried to become involved but was told not to.  Is this true?  Were his superiors not allowing him to run his department?

7. Do the two contracts allow the Fire Department to adequately protect the Village as they are bargained?  There has been no problem in the day with the IAFF contract that has been in effect for years.  If problems arise from this point forward, it would be logical to conclude that there are problems with the new IAEP union contract.  Can the Village get out of this contract somehow?  I don’t believe that they can, but maybe it should be looked at.

Quite honestly this whole thing stinks.  Like I have said before, I know more than most due to my being friends with members from both unions and this is still confusing as heck.  The one thing that comes up no matter what is that there are oddities in the new union, how they were organized, how their contract was negotiated, how there was no expert outside counsel consulted, and how it was approved.

December 23, 2007 2:50 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.